That said, this is the year people who are fighting for the rights of all demand to be heard. Over the last year, several grassroots parental and professional anti-censorship groups have worked hard to have a voice in local, state, and national politics related to book banning. These include groups like Florida Freedom to Read Project (who’ve offered incredible tips on beginning a local anti-censorship group), the FREADom Fighters in Texas, Louisiana Citizens Against Censorship, North Hunterdon-Voorhees Intellectual Freedom Fighters (New Jersey), and Moms For Social Justice (Tennessee). This is but a tiny fraction of the groups out there doing the work to protect the freedom to read and intellectual freedom. Now is the time to not only find the other groups doing this work across the country but to share that information more broadly others who are ready to fight for the rights of all can do just that. Like with the database of groups banning books shared here, this database will require input from those who are working toward anti-censorship goals. Moreover, it might include groups that have a wider scope than just ensuring books are not banned — groups like Defense of Democracy, Students Rights Coalition, PEN America, and EveryLibrary fall into this category. If you’re part of one of these anti-censorship groups or know of one in your area, let’s hear about it. This database will not be shared publicly, as some of the questions will include personal information. But the list of anti-censorship groups, their locations, and their web presence (social media or websites) will be shared in the coming weeks to help connect people who are eager to join in the fight. The survey is embedded below, and the link to the Google Survey is here in case that’s easier to use and access. Loading…Loading… Please share this survey far and wide. The more who see it, the more information to be collected and shared to further the cause of protecting the First Amendment Rights of all.
Book Censorship News: January 6, 2023
Because of the holidays, this week’s roundup is the shortest it has been since starting to keep track of this news. Don’t take that as good news, though: we’re about to see a wave hitting.
80 books are under fire at Hermon Middle School (Maine). A little Google shows that right-wing joints are claiming this school had all kinds of LGBTQ+ book displays and “transitioned” a child, so it’s hard not to see the connection.
Keene Memorial Library (Nebraska) moved seven sex ed books from the children’s to the adult section of the public library. Still censorship. This is a story about how St. Cloud area schools (Minnesota) have not seen a wave of book challenges yet. But there’s something concerning about how one of the schools has a preemptive form that has to be filled out any time a teacher wants to bring a new book or resource into their classroom. This allows some nice quiet censorship to happen by administration. Remember when right-wing outlets tried to get State Farm canceled because of their connection to GenderCool — and it all turned out to be a lot of misinformation left and right, meant to stir up the bigots? Now they’re doing it for GM. This story has no other purpose.
Two Riverside, Illinois, residents want to get Gender Queer removed from the local public library. “DeSantis’ lawyers state that Pico applies to the availability of library books while HB1557 applies only to classroom instruction. While this is what DeSantis’ lawyers are telling a federal judge, school librarians are receiving a different message.” Are we surprised that the Florida governor is telling a different story to library workers than the legal team? Speaking of Florida, here’s what’s happening with the panel determining how library workers will be trained on doing their own job. Spoiler: it’s a mess. This is a whole story about how police should handle book complaints (Louisiana). Polk County, Florida’s two new schools will still have no books available because the board is waiting for “conservative groups” to review all of the titles. WE LIVE IN A WORLD WHERE A CONSERVATIVE GROUP CAN DELAY TWO SCHOOL LIBRARIES BEING FILLED. This group has no background or experience in education, literacy, or child development but they have this kind of power. Naturally, the journalist doesn’t bother naming the group. David is drinking the Kool-aid and has some poor literacy skills. But go on, David. The paper knows they don’t have to print everything they receive from the public, right? (He’s mad about Gender Queer in a Massachusetts school). There has been an official complaint filed against several books at the Old Rochester Regional School District (Massachusetts, same as above). This will launch the formal review. Meanwhile this letter is eye-opening: Salmon River Joint School District (Idaho) apparently experienced a number of book challenges of “books on a list” from one of its own school board members, disliked the response he got, then fought with the administration about it. The update on this challenge will appear here next week, but know that Let’s Talk About It was under discussion Thursday night at Valley City Barnes County Public Library (North Dakota).
“Superintendent Tammy Wolicki and solicitor Krisha DiMascio are hammering out a book procurement policy that would aim to keep inappropriate books out of the school library. Though board members remain divided on the standard for appropriateness, they agree sexually explicit books should not be placed or remain in the library.” Maybe the fact that there’s no agreed-upon standard for appropriateness is the sign that you’re not the expert and in no position to do so (Pennsylvania). A look at the timeline of when Ohio County Schools’ (West Virginia) teachers were told to remove ten books from their curriculum, including a book about Ruby Bridges. This is a great and important read from Jonathan Friedman (PEN America) about book banning trends to watch for this year.
